+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 23.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. The model shows competitive results across 6 benchmarks. Notable strengths include AIME 2024 (73.6%), GPQA (70.8%), AIME 2025 (64.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
16 days newer
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:41.8%(+23.2%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:18.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:41.8%(+23.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:18.6%
Providers:0