+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 13.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
11 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:47.4%(+13.1%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:34.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:47.4%(+13.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:34.3%
Providers:2