+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral NeMo Instruct leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, Mistral NeMo Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Nemo was developed as a mid-sized instruction-tuned model, designed to balance capability with efficiency for practical deployments. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for various applications, it provides reliable performance across general language understanding and generation tasks.
11 months newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:60.4%
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:66.3%(+6.0%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:60.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:66.3%(+6.0%)
Providers:2