+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct leads with 12.8% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.9%), AI2D (92.9%), HumanEval Plus (92.9%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 days newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:27.3%
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:40.2%(+12.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:27.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:40.2%(+12.8%)
Providers:0