+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemma 3n E4B leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. o1-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, Gemma 3n E4B is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:41.8%(+16.4%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:25.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:41.8%(+16.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:25.4%
Providers:2