+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o3-mini leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. o3-mini is available on 2 providers. Overall, o3-mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 26 benchmarks. It excels particularly in COLLIE (98.7%), MATH (97.9%), IFEval (93.9%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 37 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:19.2%
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:40.0%(+20.8%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
2 providers
Azure
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:19.2%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:40.0%(+20.8%)
Providers:2