+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Phi 4
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 leads with 14.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 was introduced as the fourth generation of Microsoft's small language model series, designed to push the boundaries of what compact models can achieve. Built with advanced training techniques and architectural improvements, it demonstrates continued progress in efficient, high-quality language models.
6 months newer
Phi 4
Microsoft
2024-12-12
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:60.8%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Average Score:75.5%(+14.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
Phi 4
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
1 providers
DeepInfra
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4
Avg Score:75.5%(+14.7%)
Providers:1