+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Mini leads with 19.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Phi 4 Mini is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.4% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (88.6%), ARC-C (83.7%), BoolQ (81.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:33.9%
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:52.9%(+19.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:33.9%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:52.9%(+19.1%)
Providers:0