+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads with 24.1% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-E (81.6%), BoolQ (81.6%), PIQA (81.0%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.3% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (95.9%), HumanEval (88.4%), HellaSwag (85.2%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:27.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:51.4%(+24.1%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:27.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:51.4%(+24.1%)
Providers:0