+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Gemma 3n E4B vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 9.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3n E4B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3N E4B was developed as a slightly larger edge-optimized variant, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while still fitting within edge computing constraints. Built to serve applications that can accommodate more parameters for improved quality, it expands the range of edge deployment options.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B was developed as the flagship model in the Qwen2 generation, designed to provide advanced language understanding with 72 billion parameters. Built to deliver strong performance across diverse tasks, it represented a significant advancement in Qwen's model capabilities when introduced.
11 months newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
Gemma 3n E4B
2025-06-26
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Average Score:70.6%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:80.5%(+9.9%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemma 3n E4B
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3n E4B
Avg Score:70.6%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:80.5%(+9.9%)
Providers:0