+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs GPT-4.1 nano
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 46.7% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4.1 nano supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4.1 Nano was developed as the smallest and most efficient variant in the GPT-4.1 family, designed for applications requiring minimal latency and resource usage. Built to enable AI capabilities on edge devices and resource-constrained environments, it distills GPT-4.1 capabilities into an ultra-compact form factor.
3 months newer
GPT-4.1 nano
OpenAI
2025-04-14
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:75.8%(+46.7%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Average Score:29.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4.1 nano
2024-05-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
1 providers
OpenAI
Throughput: 200 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:75.8%(+46.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4.1 nano
Avg Score:29.1%
Providers:1