+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs GPT-4o mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 41.8% higher average benchmark score. GPT-4o mini supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini was created as a smaller, more efficient variant of GPT-4o, designed to bring multimodal capabilities to applications requiring faster response times and lower costs. Built to democratize access to advanced vision and text understanding, it enables developers to build sophisticated applications with reduced resource requirements.
1 year newer
GPT-4o mini
OpenAI
2024-07-18
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:66.3%(+41.8%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Average Score:24.4%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Coding57.6%(+48.9%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Coding8.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-4o mini
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
1 providers
Azure
Throughput: 92 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:66.3%(+41.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
GPT-4o mini
Avg Score:24.4%
Providers:1