+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2 Instruct leads with 35.3% higher average benchmark score. Overall, Kimi K2 Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.7% across 38 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), GSM8k (97.3%), CBNSL (95.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
17 days newer
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 43 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:19.8%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:55.1%(+35.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:19.8%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:55.1%(+35.3%)
Providers:1