+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 1.1% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
17 days newer
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:71.9%(+1.1%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:70.8%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Coding57.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Coding71.6%(+14.0%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
1 providers
Novita
Throughput: 45 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:71.9%(+1.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:70.8%
Providers:1