+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 5.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:64.1%(+5.0%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:59.1%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Coding57.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+8.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:64.1%(+5.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:59.1%
Providers:0