+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct leads with 16.4% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.7% across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM-8K (CoT) (95.1%), ARC-C (94.8%), API-Bank (90.0%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 9 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 30 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:28.4%
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Average Score:44.8%(+16.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
9 providers
Bedrock
Throughput: 100 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:28.4%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Avg Score:44.8%(+16.4%)
Providers:9