+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 22.1% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1 is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 79.2% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.0%), IFEval (89.5%), GPQA (76.0%). Released in 2025, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:50.1%(+22.1%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:28.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:50.1%(+22.1%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:28.0%
Providers:0