+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 1.5% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:81.3%(+1.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:79.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:81.3%(+1.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:79.8%
Providers:0