+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 4.9% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.3 Nemotron Super 49B was created through NVIDIA's optimization of Llama 3.3, designed to provide a balanced option with 49 billion parameters. Built to serve as a versatile mid-to-large-scale offering, it combines NVIDIA's customization expertise with Meta's foundation architecture.
4 months newer
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
2025-03-18
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:86.5%(+4.9%)
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Average Score:81.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:86.5%(+4.9%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Avg Score:81.6%
Providers:0