+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral NeMo Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 15.3% higher average benchmark score. Mistral NeMo Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:38.7%(+15.3%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Average Score:23.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
2 providers
Throughput: 42 tok/s
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:38.7%(+15.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Avg Score:23.4%
Providers:2