+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 33.8% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Base was developed as a 24-billion-parameter foundation model, designed to serve as a base for fine-tuning and customization. Built to provide a strong starting point for domain-specific applications, it represents an intermediate-scale option in Mistral's model lineup.
5 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+33.8%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Average Score:44.4%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+33.8%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Avg Score:44.4%
Providers:0