+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 22.4% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is available on 2 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
5 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+22.4%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:55.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+22.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:55.8%
Providers:2