+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 31.4% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base represents an updated iteration of the 24B foundation model, developed with architectural refinements and improved training. Built to provide enhanced base capabilities for fine-tuning, it incorporates learnings from previous versions for better downstream performance.
4 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+31.4%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Average Score:46.8%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
1 providers
Mistral AI
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+31.4%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Base
Avg Score:46.8%
Providers:1