+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 37.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5 MoE was created using a mixture-of-experts architecture, designed to provide enhanced capabilities while maintaining efficiency through sparse activation. Built to combine the benefits of larger models with practical computational requirements, it represents Microsoft's exploration of efficient scaling techniques.
11 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+37.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:41.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+37.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:41.0%
Providers:0