+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Phi 4 Mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 39.2% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini was created as an even more compact variant of Phi-4, designed to bring fourth-generation capabilities to the smallest possible footprint. Built for extreme efficiency scenarios, it enables AI capabilities on devices and applications where resources are severely constrained.
5 months newer
Phi 4 Mini
Microsoft
2025-02-01
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+39.2%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Average Score:39.0%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini
2024-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+39.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini
Avg Score:39.0%
Providers:0