+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 19.0% higher average benchmark score. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
10 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+19.0%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:59.3%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+19.0%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:59.3%
Providers:0