+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 39.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:78.2%(+39.3%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:38.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:78.2%(+39.3%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:38.9%
Providers:0