+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 26.3% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is a multimodal language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 66.9% across 30 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (96.4%), Android Control Low_EM (93.7%), ChartQA (89.5%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-01-26
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Average performance across 44 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:19.3%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Average Score:45.6%(+26.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
0 providers
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:19.3%
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Avg Score:45.6%(+26.3%)
Providers:0