+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 6.5% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
3 months newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:80.0%(+6.5%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:73.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:80.0%(+6.5%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:73.6%
Providers:3