+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 9.7% higher average benchmark score. Qwen3 32B is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5-Air is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5-Air is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 60.8% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.1%), AIME 2024 (89.4%), MMLU-Pro (81.4%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 72.0% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Arena Hard (93.8%), AIME 2024 (81.4%), LiveBench (74.9%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:40.5%(+9.7%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:30.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
3 providers
DeepInfra
Throughput:
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:40.5%(+9.7%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:3