+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5-Air vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5-Air leads with 4.2% higher average benchmark score. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 Air was created as a lightweight variant of GLM-4.5, designed to provide strong bilingual capabilities with improved efficiency. Built to serve applications requiring practical deployment with reduced resource requirements, it extends GLM-4.5's multilingual strengths to resource-conscious scenarios.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Thinking was created as a reasoning-enhanced variant, designed to incorporate extended analytical capabilities into the Qwen3-Next architecture. Built to handle complex problem-solving with mixture-of-experts efficiency, it serves applications requiring both deep reasoning and computational practicality.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5-Air
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Average Score:74.3%(+4.2%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Average Score:70.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
0 providers
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
1 providers
Novita
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5-Air
Avg Score:74.3%(+4.2%)
Providers:0
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking
Avg Score:70.1%
Providers:1