+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 48.3% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 241.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo was developed as an optimized version of GPT-3.5, designed to provide a balance of capability and efficiency for conversational and completion tasks. Built to serve as a cost-effective option for applications requiring reliable language understanding and generation, it became widely adopted for chatbots, content generation, and general-purpose AI assistance.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:79.1%(+48.3%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:30.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:79.1%(+48.3%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:30.8%
Providers:2