+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs GPT-3.5 Turbo
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 26.5% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 241.7K more tokens in context window than GPT-3.5 Turbo. Both models have similar pricing. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
GPT-3.5 Turbo is a language model developed by OpenAI. The model shows competitive results across 8 benchmarks. Notable strengths include DROP (70.2%), MMLU (69.8%), HumanEval (68.0%). The model is available through 2 API providers.
2 years newer
GPT-3.5 Turbo
OpenAI
2023-03-21
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Input:$0.50
Output:$1.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:42.6%(+26.5%)
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Average Score:16.1%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
GPT-3.5 Turbo
2021-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:42.6%(+26.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
GPT-3.5 Turbo
Avg Score:16.1%
Providers:2