+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Grok Code Fast 1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 58.9% higher average benchmark score. Grok Code Fast 1 offers 3.9K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5. Both models have similar pricing. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Input:$0.20
Output:$1.50($0.30 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:64.0%(+58.9%)
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Average Score:5.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:64.0%(+58.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Grok Code Fast 1
Avg Score:5.1%
Providers:1