+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2 0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 23.0% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 262.1K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5. GLM-4.5 is $1.10 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($1.10 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.50
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:52.7%(+23.0%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Average Score:29.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:52.7%(+23.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 0905
Avg Score:29.7%
Providers:2