+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2 Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 5.0% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is $0.87 cheaper per million tokens. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
17 days newer
Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($0.87 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Input:$0.57
Output:$2.30
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 6 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:75.8%(+5.0%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Average Score:70.8%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Coding64.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Coding71.6%(+7.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:75.8%(+5.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2 Instruct
Avg Score:70.8%
Providers:1