+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 26.9% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.1% across 29 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), MMLU-Redux (92.7%), IFEval (89.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 34 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:26.3%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:53.3%(+26.9%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:26.3%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:53.3%(+26.9%)
Providers:0