+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 8.7% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct-0905 represents a specific release iteration of the K2 Instruct model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements. Built to provide enhanced instruction-following based on deployment feedback, it continues the evolution of Moonshot's instruction-tuned offerings.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:67.7%(+8.7%)
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:59.1%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Coding64.2%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Coding65.8%(+1.6%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:67.7%(+8.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:59.1%
Providers:0