+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 42.5% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is $1.94 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 3.1 8B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Meta
Llama 3.1 8B was developed as an efficient open-source model, designed to bring capable instruction-following to applications with limited computational resources. Built with 8 billion parameters, it provides a lightweight option for developers seeking reliable performance without the overhead of larger models.
1 year newer
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Input:$0.03
Output:$0.03($1.94 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:81.8%(+42.5%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Average Score:39.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
2023-12-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:81.8%(+42.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Avg Score:39.3%
Providers:9