+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 6.0% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is a language model developed by NVIDIA. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 67.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.4%), HellaSwag (85.6%), Winogrande (84.5%). Released in 2024, it represents NVIDIA's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
2024-10-01
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 25 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:35.8%(+6.0%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Average Score:29.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:35.8%(+6.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Avg Score:29.9%
Providers:0