+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 3.6% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B was developed as NVIDIA's largest Nemotron variant, designed to provide maximum capability through extensive customization of large-scale foundations. Built with 253 billion parameters and NVIDIA's specialized training, it represents the flagship offering in the Nemotron family.
3 months newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
NVIDIA
2025-04-07
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:83.4%(+3.6%)
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Average Score:79.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
2023-12-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:83.4%(+3.6%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Llama 3.1 Nemotron Ultra 253B v1
Avg Score:79.8%
Providers:0