Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 4 Maverick leads with 1.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Maverick offers 1.7M more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5. Llama 4 Maverick is $1.23 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Maverick supports multimodal inputs. Llama 4 Maverick is available on 7 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 4 Maverick is a multimodal language model developed by Meta. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.8% across 13 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (94.4%), MGSM (92.3%), ChartQA (90.0%). With a 2.0M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 7 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Llama 4 Maverick
Meta
2025-04-05
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
GLM-4.5
Llama 4 Maverick
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 24 common benchmarks
GLM-4.5
Llama 4 Maverick
Available providers and their performance metrics
GLM-4.5
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Llama 4 Maverick
GLM-4.5
Llama 4 Maverick
GLM-4.5
Llama 4 Maverick
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Sambanova
Together