+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Magistral Medium
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 16.1% higher average benchmark score. Magistral Medium supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium was introduced as a specialized model for advanced reasoning and analytical tasks, designed to handle complex problem-solving scenarios. Built to serve enterprise and professional applications requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Mistral's focus on high-quality analytical capabilities.
1 month newer
Magistral Medium
Mistral AI
2025-06-10
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:81.0%(+16.1%)
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Average Score:64.9%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Magistral Medium
2025-06-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:81.0%(+16.1%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Magistral Medium
Avg Score:64.9%
Providers:0