+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs MedGemma 4B IT
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 23.1% higher average benchmark score. MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT is a multimodal language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MIMIC CXR (88.9%), DermMCQA (71.8%), PathMCQA (69.8%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 months newer
MedGemma 4B IT
2025-05-20
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:42.6%(+23.1%)
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Average Score:19.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:42.6%(+23.1%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
MedGemma 4B IT
Avg Score:19.5%
Providers:0