+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Mistral Large 2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 24.1% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Large 2. GLM-4.5 is $6.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Large 2 is a language model developed by Mistral AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 87.6% across 5 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (93.0%), HumanEval (92.0%), MT-Bench (86.3%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Mistral Large 2
Mistral AI
2024-07-24
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($6.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Input:$2.00
Output:$6.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 19 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:47.1%(+24.1%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Average Score:23.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:47.1%(+24.1%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Large 2
Avg Score:23.1%
Providers:2