Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 17.3% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral NeMo Instruct. Mistral NeMo Instruct is $1.70 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
Mistral AI
Mistral NeMo Instruct is a language model developed by Mistral AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.3% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (83.5%), Winogrande (76.8%), TriviaQA (73.8%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Mistral AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI
2024-07-18
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
GLM-4.5
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
GLM-4.5
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics
GLM-4.5
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Mistral NeMo Instruct
GLM-4.5
Mistral NeMo Instruct
GLM-4.5
Mistral NeMo Instruct
Mistral AI