+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 26.0% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 198.1K more tokens in context window than Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct. Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct is $1.79 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 24B Instruct was created as the instruction-tuned version of the 24B base model, designed to follow user instructions reliably. Built to serve general-purpose applications requiring moderate capability, it balances performance with deployment practicality.
5 months newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-01-30
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Input:$0.07
Output:$0.14($1.79 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:81.8%(+26.0%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Average Score:55.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:81.8%(+26.0%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3 24B Instruct
Avg Score:55.8%
Providers:2