+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 25.5% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of the 3.1 base model, designed to deliver improved instruction-following with refinements from the updated architecture. Built to serve diverse applications with enhanced reliability, it advances the Small model line's capabilities.
4 months newer
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-03-17
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:81.8%(+25.5%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Average Score:56.4%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:81.8%(+25.5%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.1 24B Instruct
Avg Score:56.4%
Providers:0