+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 25.2% higher average benchmark score. Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct represents a further evolution of the Small model series, developed with continued refinements to instruction-following and task performance. Built to incorporate ongoing improvements, it provides the latest capabilities in Mistral's intermediate-scale offering.
1 month newer
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Mistral AI
2025-06-20
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:81.8%(+25.2%)
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Average Score:56.6%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
2023-10-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:81.8%(+25.2%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Mistral Small 3.2 24B Instruct
Avg Score:56.6%
Providers:0