+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 25.8% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 68.6K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. GLM-4.5 is $13.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.9% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (92.4%), MATH-500 (90.0%), MMLU (85.2%). It supports a 194K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
10 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($13.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:49.8%(+25.8%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:24.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:49.8%(+25.8%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:24.0%
Providers:2