+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs o1-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 13.7% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 68.6K more tokens in context window than o1-mini. GLM-4.5 is $13.00 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o1-mini was created as a faster, more cost-effective reasoning model, designed to bring extended thinking capabilities to applications with tighter latency and budget constraints. Built to excel particularly in coding and STEM reasoning while maintaining affordability, it provides a more accessible entry point to reasoning-enhanced AI assistance.
10 months newer
o1-mini
OpenAI
2024-09-12
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($13.00 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Input:$3.00
Output:$12.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:88.7%(+13.7%)
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Average Score:75.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:88.7%(+13.7%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o1-mini
Avg Score:75.0%
Providers:2