+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs o3-mini
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 14.1% higher average benchmark score. o3-mini offers 37.9K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.5. GLM-4.5 is $3.50 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
OpenAI
o3-mini was created as an efficient variant of the o3 reasoning model, designed to provide advanced thinking capabilities with reduced computational requirements. Built to make next-generation reasoning accessible to a broader range of applications, it balances analytical depth with practical speed and cost considerations.
5 months newer
o3-mini
OpenAI
2025-01-30
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60($3.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Input:$1.10
Output:$4.40
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:74.9%(+14.1%)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Average Score:60.8%
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Coding64.2%(+14.9%)
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Coding49.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
o3-mini
2023-09-30
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:74.9%(+14.1%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
o3-mini
Avg Score:60.8%
Providers:2