+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 15.4% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-4 Mini Reasoning was developed to incorporate extended thinking capabilities into the ultra-compact Phi-4 Mini architecture. Built to demonstrate that reasoning enhancements can be applied even to very small models, it brings analytical depth to resource-constrained environments.
2 months newer
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Microsoft
2025-04-30
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:88.7%(+15.4%)
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Average Score:73.3%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
2025-02-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:88.7%(+15.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Avg Score:73.3%
Providers:0