+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Qwen2 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen2 72B Instruct leads with 12.3% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, Qwen2 72B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 is a language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.0% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (98.2%), AIME 2024 (91.0%), MMLU-Pro (84.6%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 3 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2 72B Instruct is a language model developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 73.6% across 17 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (91.1%), CMMLU (90.1%), HellaSwag (87.6%). Released in 2024, it represents Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-07-23
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 29 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Average Score:43.2%(+12.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2 72B Instruct
Avg Score:43.2%(+12.3%)
Providers:0