+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 42.9% higher average benchmark score. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni 7B was created as a multimodal model supporting text, audio, and other modalities, designed to provide integrated understanding across diverse input types. Built with 7 billion parameters for efficient omni-modal processing, it extends AI capabilities beyond traditional text-only or vision-language boundaries.
4 months newer
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-27
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:81.8%(+42.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Average Score:38.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:81.8%(+42.9%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Avg Score:38.9%
Providers:0