+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 8.4% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 6.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $1.60 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
3 months newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($1.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:82.0%(+8.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:73.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:82.0%(+8.4%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:73.6%
Providers:3