+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
GLM-4.5 vs Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.5 leads with 10.6% higher average benchmark score. GLM-4.5 offers 131.1K more tokens in context window than Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct. Both models have similar pricing. GLM-4.5 is available on 3 providers. Overall, GLM-4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.5 was developed by Zhipu AI as an advanced bilingual language model, designed to excel at both Chinese and English language tasks. Built to serve diverse applications across multiple languages, it represents Zhipu AI's commitment to multilingual AI capabilities.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3-Next 80B Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Qwen3-Next 80B, designed to combine large-scale mixture-of-experts architecture with reliable instruction-following. Built to demonstrate efficient deployment of capable models, it balances advanced performance with practical computational efficiency.
1 month newer
GLM-4.5
Zhipu AI
2025-07-28
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-09-10
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Input:$0.40
Output:$1.60
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Input:$0.15
Output:$1.50($0.35 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 5 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Average Score:76.3%(+10.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Average Score:65.7%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
3 providers
DeepInfra
Novita
ZeroEval
Throughput: 85 tok/s
Latency: 0.7ms
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.5
Avg Score:76.3%(+10.6%)
Providers:3
+
+
+
+
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Instruct
Avg Score:65.7%
Providers:1